by Thomas Craig

As the GOP continues to debate over the best way to reassemble a Party which has lost its way, there seems to be a growing divide within our members.  There is a faction of Republicans who believe that the way forward should include returning the Party back to ultra-conservative values where religion dictates the direction of our platforms.  Of course, there are others who want to see the Party move closer to the middle, compromising some widely held religious beliefs for the sake of political gain.  Personally, I think they are both right.  I believe that instead of narrowing the Party down to stances based on religious beliefs or trying to separate our Party from the ultra-conservative factions, we can become a Party that includes us all.  Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going to put flowers in my rifle and start singing John Lennon songs, however I do think that the Republican Party has room for many people who share the basic principles of what a Republican is.  To begin with, a Republican is somebody who believes in limited Government, individual liberty, and both personal and fiscal responsibility.  We believe that we, the People, should be the masters of our Government and not the other way around.  We are law-abiding citizens, however, we acknowledge that there are certain unalienable rights to which we are all entitled to.  While Democrats use the Constitution as their justification for growing power for the Government, Republicans use the one single document that is above the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, to maintain the principles to which our Nation was founded on.  It doesn't matter which hat you wear, just as long as at the end of the day, that hat says GOP on it.  One thing that I think has acted as an impediment to our Party is contradictory actions, which have been a staple of all Members of the Party.  For example, the fact that the Government grew significantly during the last eight years is a complete contradiction to the principles of Republican governing.  We spent ridiculous amounts of money, which was bad enough, however the fact that the money was borrowed from Countries with hostile intentions to the US makes it that much worse.  Gay Marriage is another example.  I know this will get me a lot of jeers from many Republicans but the simple fact is that it is difficult to argue for limited Government, and then advocate for the Government dictating who can and cannot get married.  I'm not saying that People have to morally accept it or be happy with it, but actively opposing it in the form of trying to pass laws to deny it is contrary to the core beliefs of the Republican Party.  Perhaps you, as a loyal Republican, disagree with me.  That's fine if you do because what is important is that at the end of the day, you and I are still Republicans.



 


Comments

Charity Boyce

Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:10:25

Regarding Gay Marriage & the Government's role: The founders knew that the Constitution would only be sufficient in a moral society where Judeo/Christian values based on the Bible/Tora provide the cultural morals for that society to be SELF-controlled. Personal responsibility is a moral value that goes totally against the hedonistic, secular humanist society that we now have based on spoiled, selfish & immoral human depravity. It may be uncomfortable for some to accept, but it is true. There are countless scriptural references in the founders writings, along with their beliefs about morality. So, no the government should not HAVE to define marriage. I believe that marriage existed before government, authorized by a higher authority. However, due to the fact that government already authorizes marriage, a larger burden is placed on it's significance when people attempt to redefine the morals and laws of our society through it. Since it is a legally binding contract in which one must obtain a license from the government, which courts must dissolve when requested, it is in some way endorsed or regulated...already. If a license were not required, by what authority would people be considered married? God? That provides a problem for secularists. And, of course, there are those within the church who completely twist/omit scripture to accomodate whatever they choose to endorse. People can leave God out of the equation and go to the court to get married, but then we as a society must have a say in what we accept as social norms...for the good of society. Since marriage is foundational to society in general, and government IS already involved, conservatives are only asking for the existing definition to remain in tact based on the values that have provided the backbone for the self-governance in the first place. Those who wish to challenge it create an environment to grow the government's involvement. The government is also growing, because in addition to a lack of self-government, many people no longer self-support, help their neighbors, widows & orphans. The national defense that the federal government is supposed to provide has failed in terms of our borders also contributing to the growing nanny state...So, stripped down, the fed has failed in it's most basic job and gotten involved in too much as a result of it's failure and the dying morality of it's republic. For those that would like to re-define the GOP to anything other than conservative, I would ask what they are basing the few principles mentioned on? Why settle for the "middle"? Why not go left? People need to know where the values came from to truly understand the battle that we are in.

 



Leave a Reply

    RSS Feed

    Picture

    Recent Posts

    Categories

    All
    America
    Auto
    Bobby Jindal
    Climate Change
    Congress
    Credit Crisis
    Economy
    Education
    Energy
    Federalism
    Geithner
    Generational Warfare
    Gop
    Healthcare
    Homeland Security
    Iran
    Israel
    Jefferson
    Kennedy
    Liberalism
    Libertarian
    Lincoln
    Michael Steele
    Mideast
    Military
    New York
    North Korea
    Notable Quotables
    President Obama
    Racial Issues
    Rnc
    Samesex Marriage
    Senate
    Social Security
    Socialism
    Stimulus
    Term Limits
    Unions
    United Nations

    Archives

    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009

    About Us

    American Tusk is a site devoted to those amongst us who put Country before Party. We are true Republicans.  American Tusk is dedicated to a smarter, stronger and better GOP.  Together we can make our Country better and move forward optimistically into the future!

    Picture