Redefining the GOP 04/07/2009
![]() by Thomas Craig CommentsCharity Boyce Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:10:25 Regarding Gay Marriage & the Government's role: The founders knew that the Constitution would only be sufficient in a moral society where Judeo/Christian values based on the Bible/Tora provide the cultural morals for that society to be SELF-controlled. Personal responsibility is a moral value that goes totally against the hedonistic, secular humanist society that we now have based on spoiled, selfish & immoral human depravity. It may be uncomfortable for some to accept, but it is true. There are countless scriptural references in the founders writings, along with their beliefs about morality. So, no the government should not HAVE to define marriage. I believe that marriage existed before government, authorized by a higher authority. However, due to the fact that government already authorizes marriage, a larger burden is placed on it's significance when people attempt to redefine the morals and laws of our society through it. Since it is a legally binding contract in which one must obtain a license from the government, which courts must dissolve when requested, it is in some way endorsed or regulated...already. If a license were not required, by what authority would people be considered married? God? That provides a problem for secularists. And, of course, there are those within the church who completely twist/omit scripture to accomodate whatever they choose to endorse. People can leave God out of the equation and go to the court to get married, but then we as a society must have a say in what we accept as social norms...for the good of society. Since marriage is foundational to society in general, and government IS already involved, conservatives are only asking for the existing definition to remain in tact based on the values that have provided the backbone for the self-governance in the first place. Those who wish to challenge it create an environment to grow the government's involvement. The government is also growing, because in addition to a lack of self-government, many people no longer self-support, help their neighbors, widows & orphans. The national defense that the federal government is supposed to provide has failed in terms of our borders also contributing to the growing nanny state...So, stripped down, the fed has failed in it's most basic job and gotten involved in too much as a result of it's failure and the dying morality of it's republic. For those that would like to re-define the GOP to anything other than conservative, I would ask what they are basing the few principles mentioned on? Why settle for the "middle"? Why not go left? People need to know where the values came from to truly understand the battle that we are in. Leave a Reply |

RSS Feed






